Agile Otter Blog

I did not manage to use my Christmas break to get a lot of work done on the book . I tried, but there was much going on in our world (almost all good stuff) and I was unable to get the focused time I was hoping for. You might be able to access a sample of the draft as of today. It is only a small bit of the book, but maybe enough to whet your appetite. I hope to decide on the "early adopters" price soon, and finish up the initial set of illustrations (thereby getting rid of the ugly ascii art that appears in some places, and breaking up the expanse of text that appears in others). If you want, use the public page to suggest a price. Thanks for waiting. I hope you'll find the result thought-provoking and useful.

Linda takes us from a negative to a positive affective style, from a posture of seeming or being to one of becoming.  There is just so much to know and understand here. If you don't already love Linda Rising, you surely will after this. Notice the tie-in to Seeming v. Being v. Becoming . Mine is derivative, of course.

It's a common thread in agile transitions that people are not sure what pairing, teamwork, and self-organization will do to their status on the team. Will the team be so leveled that nobody will stand out? Will the weak be exposed and humiliated? I am going to write this as if there were two states, strong and weak. Before reading anything that follows, remember that everyone is good in some areas and weaker in others. I have seen javascript gurus who weren't very database-smart, and people who were great with requirements and product knowledge but had no sense of scalability or performance. Any human characteristics are spectra, not point measurements. With that in always in mind, read on: There is good news, more good news, and some hard and potentially sad news in all of this. The first bit of good news is that nobody who works in an agile team ever asks these questions. In reality, it's not a problem. Let's get down to cases. Rockstars If you are the rock s...